Ag Trader USA
About usAbout Us
More about us and what we do.
ClassifiedsClassifieds
Equipment, property & more...
SubscribeSubscribe
Begin your subscription today.
ArticlesArticles
Farm safety, animal care & more...
AdvertiseAdvertise
Advertise with us, view our rates.

November 2016 Articles

Just Rambling November 2016
Spiritual Corner:
Fear and uncertainty in cattle markets
Cattle producers hear about nutrition, pasture management at field day
Factors Affecting Costs and Returns
Louisiana cotton crop disappointing
Sweet potato producers see weather-related losses
Pansies, violas make ideal winter flower gardens
Growers learn ways to profit from pumpkin patches
NCBA Requests Extension to FDA Comment Period
USDA Invests $1.7 Billion to Protect Sensitive Agricultural Lands through Conser
Statement by Zippy Duvall, President, American Farm Bureau Federation, Regarding
• Government and Industry Groups Ask Court to Overturn EPA Water Rule
Use weed killers properly
LSU AgCenter committed to poultry research, education 
FDA Awards Louisiana Millions to Implement
AgCenter receives grant to inform produce growers about food safety
USDA Announces Enrollment Period for Safety Net Coverage in 2017
USDA Announces Streamlined Guaranteed Loans and Additional Lender Category for S

(19 articles found)

Archives by Months

Government and Industry Groups Ask Court to Overturn EPA Water Rule

Government and Industry Groups Ask Court to Overturn EPA Water Rule Source: www.fb.org
WASHINGTON, D.C., Nov. 1, 2016 - The American Farm Bureau Federation, along with dozens of agricultural, business and municipal entities, today asked a federal court to vacate the EPA's and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' "Waters of the United States" rule. The brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit lays out in detail the substance of the groups' allegations. It follows a year of litigation over which court had jurisdiction to hear challenges to the expansive and unlawful rule.
The coalition's brief explains how EPA flouted important procedural safeguards designed to ensure a fair and thoughtful rulemaking process. EPA tactics included withholding key documents until after the public comment period had closed, ignoring and ridiculing critical public comments and issuing illegal "covert propaganda" in an effort to generate superficial public support for the rule.
"EPA set out to achieve a predetermined outcome and then manipulated the public notice-and-comment process to achieve that outcome," AFBF General Counsel Ellen Steen said. "It treated the rulemaking process like a game to be won instead of a deliberative process for developing lawful and reasonable regulations."
The brief also explains how the rule violates the limits of the Clean Water Act and the Constitution. Petitioners show how the rule relies on vague definitions that allow agency enforcers to regulate land features that look nothing like "navigable waters" and provides no fair notice to the public of what features are covered. In determining whether a low area where rainwater flows across a field is a "tributary," the brief explains: "Regulators can reach any outcome they please, and regulated entities cannot know the outcome until they are already exposed to criminal liability, including crushing fines." The brief asks that the rule be struck in its entirety.

Advertisers - October 2021
Poole Well Service
Odom Veterinary Clinic
Read's Lumber and Supply
Red River Livestock
Southern AgCredit
Taylor Auto Body
Union Veterinary Clinic
NAPA
Taylor & Wilkes CPA's
Origin Bank