Ag Trader USA
About usAbout Us
More about us and what we do.
ClassifiedsClassifieds
Equipment, property & more...
SubscribeSubscribe
Begin your subscription today.
ArticlesArticles
Farm safety, animal care & more...
AdvertiseAdvertise
Advertise with us, view our rates.

March 2013 Articles

Just Rambling, March 2013
An open letter to the People of Louisiana
Livestock Market News
Extension awards $34,000 in special one - year grants
Crtting-edge research could improve deer populations, health
Alligator nutrition main goal of LSU AgCenter research projects
Why we use fertilizers
Beef Cow Slaughter and the Expansion Question
U A Study Shows Trace Minerals Improve Semen Quality
AFBF Outlines Priorities, Concerns with Farm Bill Legislatin
American Forest Foundation Commends Congressional Leaders on Proposed Fix to Far
Multi-Legged Stool Best Approach for Farm Bill
Statement by Bob Stallman, President, American Farm Bureau Federation Regarding
Farmers: Protect Your Skin on 'Don't Fry Day' and Every Day
Beef Production: Today vs. 1977, U.S. agriculture...
Historical Fact:
• AFBF Intervenes in Mississippi River Basin Case
LSU AgCenter, LA Cattlemen's Foundation sign lease agreement
2 nuisance caterpillars are out in greater numbers this year
Notes from Germany
Spiritual Corner
Beef Kebabs on the Grill

(22 articles found)

Archives by Months

AFBF Intervenes in Mississippi River Basin Case

AFBF Intervenes in Mississippi River Basin Case The American Farm Bureau Federation Tuesday, along with 14 state Farm Bureau organizations and 16 other national and regional agricultural organizations, filed a motion seeking to intervene in Gulf Restoration Network, et al. v. Jackson, et al., a lawsuit seeking to force the Environmental Protection Agency to establish federal numeric nutrient water quality standards for all states in the Mississippi River Basin. The resolution of the lawsuit could be significant for farmers, municipalities and others throughout the 31-state basin because numeric nutrient standards could lead to more costly and stringent limits on nutrient runoff to waters that ultimately contribute to the Mississippi River.
Under the Clean Water Act, states may use either “narrative” or “numeric” standards as a method for determining water quality. Most states in the Mississippi River Basin use narrative standards, such as “no nutrients at levels that cause a harmful imbalance of aquatic populations.” However, if this lawsuit is successful, EPA would be forced to override existing state standards with federal water quality standards and to express those standards as specific numeric limits on nutrients.
“Setting appropriate numeric nutrient standards is a complex and difficult scientific undertaking and EPA has proven it is not up to the task,” said AFBF President Bob Stallman. “Farmers have no reason to believe that EPA could establish scientifically defensible standards for any one state, much less for 40 percent of the U.S. land mass.”
According to AFBF, there are limited circumstances under which the Clean Water Act allows EPA to step in the place of a state government to establish federal water quality standards. The organization is seeking to intervene in the lawsuit to clarify those limitations to the federal District Court in Louisiana, where the case is being heard.
“Farmers and their state governments in the Mississippi River Basin have worked successfully for years to minimize nutrient runoff and will continue to do so,” said Stallman. “But we oppose a top-down, one-size-fits-all approach.”
The following state Farm Bureaus intervened in the lawsuit: Arkansas; Illinois; Iowa; Kansas; Kentucky; Louisiana; Minnesota; Mississippi; Missouri; Nebraska; Oklahoma; South Dakota; Tennessee; and Wyoming. Source: www.fb.org

Advertisers - October 2021
Poole Well Service
Odom Veterinary Clinic
Read's Lumber and Supply
Southern AgCredit
Taylor Auto Body
Thomas Nursery & Feed
Union Veterinary Clinic
NAPA
Taylor & Wilkes CPA's
Origin Bank